Our writer receives a heartening missive from a dear mentor.
I've been emailing my good friend and mentor, Joyce Murdoch, a lot. She is grieving her partner, Deb Price– America's first openly gay columnist whose mantra was "don't let fear choose your path". Joyce has been encouraging me write fiction for years. I recently told her I was struggling with workshops I had attended, and the process involved in receiving feedback. She wrote back, with trademark elegance. Hello, my friend-- Deb used to always say that she didn't know what she thought until she said it out loud. I didn't want to speak until I knew what I thought....That was a minor source of conflict over the years. She always wanted me to speak a bit more; I always wanted her to speak a bit less. And now, of course, I'd give every cent I own just so speak with her again. Anyway, that's a long way of getting around to saying, once again, that I think you ought to take the risk of writing fiction. Just write it for yourself. Get the pleasure of seeing your thoughts and feelings take shape on paper (well, on a screen at least). And do NOT--repeat, do NOT--show a word, a paragraph, a chapter to anyone until you are satisfied that you're done. Yes, writers are extremely sensitive, especially to anything that smells like criticism. Yes, writing something that actually matters to the writer feels like opening a vein. Yes, the entirely human response to having one's creative writing critiqued is to want to run away and never pick the project back up. Despite all my years as an editor, I have never ever understood why anyone thinks writing workshops or sharing a writing project while it is underway are good ideas. Creative writing should be just that--imaginative, new, unique, something no one else could have written in quite the same way. And it should tap into--for lack of a better word--the "soul" of the writer. Premature feedback--if it doesn't simply shut the writer down entirely--is going to push the writer back toward the expected, back toward works that are already out there in the world, back toward what the "group" thinks you ought to be saying with your writing, not what the blood spilled on your pages tell you. Embrace your sensitivity. Cherish it. Nurture it. Respect it. Your sensitivity is one of the traits that, I feel confident, will one day make you a fine writer and, if you want, a published author. Do NOT try to pound your sensitivity out of existence. You would, I think, kill off your creative spirit at the same time. Several years ago I wrote a novel, Twelve Turtles. The project began as simply catharsis: I had things I needed to "say" and nowhere to say them. The person I wanted to say them to wasn't speaking to me at the time. As the word count grew, the writing became really enjoyable. I loved spending hours on end with the characters I was creating and enjoyed discovering how they interacted with one another in ways I had not expected and seeing where they were taking the plot, which had had only the vaguest outline in my mind at the start. I wrote the chapters in a thoroughly haphazard order, depending on what part of the story was speaking to me at the time, and had to sort them out later. Eventually, the novel felt complete. And I was quite pleased with it. Still am, in fact. I think it's one of the best things I've ever written. Because I didn't want the novel to be public, I paid a vanity press to print 15 or 20 copies. I gave most of them to a few close friends. And even then--even when I gave them to professional writers and editors--I said, "This is a gift. I hope you enjoy it. This is not an invitation to critique the work." Even though my novel was a work of fiction is was really personal and if people had "helpful suggestions" about how it could have been different I just didn't--and still don't--want to hear them any more than I'd (theoretically) have wanted to hear that my baby would have been more handsome if his eyes weren't blue and his hair weren't curly. Can you imagine if Mary Oliver had "workshopped" my favorite poem, "Wild Geese"? People would say, "what's with the first line'''You don't have to be good?' Sounds like the intro to a self help book!" And "Why 'wild' geese? Why not just 'geese'? And on and on....until the wonderfully strange amalgam that makes "Wild Geese" so meaningful to countless readers would been ruined. Gotta run to mahjong. Would love to hear your thoughts. -Joyce
0 Comments
|
Sarah KaracsA Berlin-based writer engages in the study of belonging and in-between places after years spent faraway from 'home'. Archives
April 2023
Categories
All
|